Firefox 2.0 Beta 2
Updated 19th September - With new screenshots of updated theme.
Those who know me will also know that I have been a rabid Firefox supporter for a couple of years now. I’ve been using it as my primary browser since well before it reached 1.0, and since giving IE the flick I’ve never looked back. I was happy with the 1.0 release, and I was also content with the changes and polishing done for 1.5. I hadn’t played with the first beta of 2.0, so today is the first time I’ve been dabbling with the new changes, and while I appreciate the thoughts behind them, I can’t help but feel they’ve been somewhat poorly implemented - especially the new user interface. Now, what I am really hoping is that all of my worries are simply a case of unfinished business, and they’ll all be cleaned up for the first release candidate or the final product. But if not, then I have some serious doubts that Fx 2.0 will be enough to still be worth switching to for the IE users who will soon be comparing IE7 and Firefox - it’s not as clear cut as the previous matching between Fx and IE6.
Some of the changes are of course no-brainers. There are additional tab functions, such as undoing a close tab action, which I have previously needed an extension to achieve. Session saving in case of a crash is also something I required an extension for previously, and is now built in. That said, I haven’t seen it in action yet, as Beta 2 seems pretty stable so far.
One handy new feature which I have experienced a fair bit while writing this post is that of the inbuilt spell-checker. It’s already been quite helpful in reducing the editing needed to be done on this entry, however it’s not without it’s shortfalls. As you can see from the image to the left, it does have some comprehension problems with regards to misplaced uppercase letters. “Some” would have been a good suggestion. Another irritating aspect is that HTML tags aren’t included in the dictionary already, so writing a blog post and inserting images highlights spelling problems for tags and attributes - img, src, and png are all flagged down, and on a web browser, they shouldn’t be. Especially a web browser which is so popular amongst the blogging community.
The add-ons management has been refined for 2.0, and handily makes the Tools menu a little smaller and neater. It’s a logical change which I think works well - lumping the extensions and themes in to one window. That said, the only extensions which Firefox is currently allowing to run are AdBlock Plus, Flashgot and IETab. I’m sure it won’t be long before most of the others are updated to work with the new browser, and with 2.0’s new tab functionality, the need for the Tab Mix Plus extension I used previously is nowhere near as great. I think only Duplicate Tab is what I am now missing from it’s feature set that I miss.
Perhaps what has me most worried with this release, however, is the set of changes to the interface. The default Winstripe theme has been updated, and while the ideas are generally good, I think the implementation is horribly unpolished, even for a beta release. Below are some comparable shots:
Now, while a full screen view is recommended, just looking at the thumbnails shows many of the shortcomings of the new “improved” interface. I like to use small icons, and while they remain perfectly visible and usable in 1.5, they are now pixelated and rather amateur-looking in 2.0. Particularly the Home icon is much harder to see. The glossy look on the arrows and refresh button is not really suited to Windows XP, and using the Classic 9x/2000 skin makes it look atrocious. Oddly, hovering over one of the buttons does not cause a gradient button to form behind it, and this feels extremely strange and lacks the visual queues people would expect. It feels unresponsive.
The tabs are also dismal. Unselected tabs are now not “further back” as before, but instead faded and somewhat transparent. I find this extremely frustrating as it makes the icons and text on them harder to read, and removes the native look it had under XP. I am not sure how it looks under OSX or Linux, but the tabs also retain their new look under Win 9x/2000 and it is a horrible sight.
Update: The updated theme is quite an improvement. The tabs no longer have faded text, they look more natural (even in Windows Classic I should add) and hovering on the back, forward and refresh buttons now produce the expected gradient result we have all come to expect. The Home button is much easier to see (though a bit too brown), and the Back/Forward buttons have smoother edges, though they also appear squished. The refresh button no longer looks too washed out, however it’s shape is something that’s going to take some getting used to. Overall it’s a big step forward but still lags behind the Winstripe theme of 1.5.
One thing that also bugs me about the tabs is the implementation of the close button. Now, I do like how it is now featured on every tab, but having this obnoxious red button looks far too overbearing. Microsoft seems to have the right idea with Internet Explorer 7:
Notice the close button on the active tab is greyed out and doesn’t distract your eye. It does go red when you mouse over it, and it’s not too hard to click. Whether or not the close button should appear on unselected tabs is something I’m not entirely sure of yet. I am inclined to go for IE7’s implementation though, and save the space for extra title room. The one thing in Firefox 2.0’s tab implementation that has improved is the new list tab button. It is over to the far right where the close button once was, and is a simple small drop down menu which IE7 has as well.
Other things which I am liking is the new “Go” button. It integrates seamlessly in to the side of the location bar, and looks alright. It’s still a bit pixelated too, but I am hoping it’ll be smoothed over by final release. It also can’t be removed like the old Go button, which may bug some, but it’s so small I can’t imagine people really worrying. The new search bar has also improved, with it’s own Go button (something I have been wanting) and is slightly bigger all round.
Kindly enough, one of the people who developed the original Winstripe theme has put it up for download as a theme you can install. It does have a couple of bugs in beta 2 (namely the search bar and Go button are now completely out of whack) but I can tell I will be sticking with this theme once it’s smoothed over and 2.0 is released.
Now, there are some additional new features that I haven’t touched on - phishing detection and feed support have apparently improved, but neither of these are things I use. I have been skeptical of the 2.0 release ever since they dropped the much-touted “Places” feature and left that to do for 3.0. Overall I do appreciate what 2.0 brings to the table, but it has a long way to go (especially in the looks department) before I am happy with it. I do understand that getting a good consistent look across Vista, WinXP, Win9x, OSX and Linux is a bit more of a challenge than what the IE7 team has to handle, but there are some obvious and glaring mistakes in the UI which need rectifying. And why on earth isn’t “UI” in the Firefox dictionary?
Comments feed for this entry



1st September | Reply
Personally, I’m still running Firefox 1.0.7. Just like with most of the programs I run, I see no reason to update it into a more memory-hungry version with no real difference until I absolutely have to; also, 1.5 did some strange things to my tools menu that I don’t particularly like.
2nd September | Reply
In Reply to #1: a very important reason to upgrade is that the older versions of Firefox are no longer maintained. That means that if a security risk in such a version is found, you are in a pretty bad situation…
2nd September | Reply
@ #1 Grudgeal
You know that 2.0 has much less memory leaks, do you?
3rd September | Reply
First of all i care nothing for the looks of a browser nor stability, as long as its not a bugfest, i want speed speed speed , the amount of overall time i save with speed far out ways a crash here and there, crashes used to be vary inconvenient, but now i have session saver.I also have 1.0.7, i have tried 1.5 for about a month and have found it to be more sluggish, plus with 1.5 comes all the memory leaks with it, and when i have apps open in the background these “leaks” slow my entire system down.I also care nothing for security in a browser, you see i have this thing called common sense, saves me a lot of hassle, the only problem is you can’t download it.Now on to the things in my certain point of view are the real short comings of firefox, not these petty whininess about changes to the interface.
Number 1, the memory problem)Have you ever come to a page with lots of images? of course you have, so you think ‘oh okay I’ll just open them in tabs with my middle mouse button’ so you open all these images in there own separate tabs, you notice when your finish firefox seems more sluggish? have you ever opened the task manager at this time? if you do you will be shocked at the amount of ram firefox is taking, sometimes up to a huge 600 mem, why does firefox take so much memory just for these images? well you got me because opera does just fine doing the same thing.
Number 2, the downloads problem) Have you ever had more than 10 tabs open and tried to save a image or torrent file to your hard disk? if you do you will notice firefox seems to completely freeze for a couple seconds, you have to stop everything your doing and wait for firefix to come back out of its coma like state, why? well you got me because opera can have 30 tabs open and it download even high res images just fine.
Number 3, the tabs problem)Have you ever had to open lots of tabs? sometimes you just want to open lots of sites once just to check on whats happening this morning, so you use that wonderful ‘open in tabs’ feature in bookmarks, or you just have a lot of tabs open and need to open more, but then you notice some tabs are completely obscured, you wonder where those tabs went that should be on the end of the tabs toolbar, well my friend they’ve gone to a better place, i place i like to call THE VOID ahem…that is, they did not disappear, rather in the developers great and ultimate wisdom, decided that when you have to many tabs you won’t be able to access the tabs beyond the reach of the toolbar,now some unbelievers and sadists think it would be easy for the divine developers to just make it so another toolbar appears to accommodate the new tabs, but we true believers know the such unholy houghts are the bane of mankind, praise the developers!.
In reply to kwanbis: Really? i was kinda hoping for…well you know..maybe no leaks.
5th September | Reply
In Reply to #4:
I’m no expert in browser/computer security, but I was under the impression that common sense does not prevent against all forms of attack. For example, I believe it possible for an attack to be made using malformed image files that could be posted to an entirely legitimate forum but which cause problems when you visit the forum and your browser attempts to display the image. In this respect I would suggest that you have a rather cowboy attitude to security and it’s one that I’d expect to bite you at some time.
For my part I can’t make up my mind which browser I prefer the most. I want to love Camino but with no RSS support and frequent pauses it annoys too much. Firefox and Opera are no-nos for me since neither supports the Mac properly (Network Preferences, Keychain Services and Dictionary) and even Flock falls into this category despite it being overwise pretty wonderful. In the end I keep ending back with good ol’ Safari as a browser that is neither excellant but one that doesn’t annoy either. Presently I’m holding out hope that Shiira 2 will be all that it can be but I’m not holding my breath.
5th September | Reply
I’ve never quite understood what the ‘Go’ button is for. Can’t you just press enter and achieve the same results, quicker?
Also, whilst overall Firefox is better than my previous browser (some Yahoo quasi-IE browser) I did prefer the tab feature in that. You could press a button to bring up a new tab, instead of having to go through Ctrl+T (granted the double click for new tabs after that is better, but its just bringing up the first new tab that annoys me).
It also looked better.
6th September | Reply
Thorny - there is a New Tab button you can use. Just right-click on the back/home/refresh buttons in Firefox and choose customise. You will see the New Tab button there, and you can just drag it to where you want it.
Also, I find the go button useful for when I have just used the mouse to select something in the history of the location bar. It’s not often, but the Go button takes up so little room anywya I’ve just left it there.
6th September | Reply
Ah right. That’s useful, and a few more points to Firefox then.
10th September | Reply
I’m a firefox convert. Except for some websites that are dumbly made only with IE in mind…. What I find particularly aghasting is seeing so called “computer experts” still using IE. I cringe.
11th September | Reply
In Reply to #9:
The classic one is an email that I received from the IT support desk for one of our enterprise applications. This email went out after Microsoft fixed the bodged IE patch recently that had rendered our application unusable via IE and had resulted in the same support group requesting users to download Firefox as a workaround. The new email informed users that the problem had been fixed and that after the installation of the new patch that IE only should once again be used in order to avoid “security problems”. I was rather tempted to reply back to inquire as to whether they had honestly written that email with a straight face…
19th September | Reply
Just a quick note to mention the new screenshot I added of the most recent build of Bon Echo (that’s Firefox 2’s codename… to make sure people know it’s not an official release). It looks a lot better but I’m still not particularly happy with it.