Aelon - Gaming & Technology Blog.
  • Blog Founded: July 20, 2004
  • Total Entries on Blog: 240
  • Most Commented Entry: Jack Thompson... Straw Man
  • Total Comments on Blog: 2102

Aelon is an archived blog which was run from 2004-2008. The site is being left up indefinitely to serve those looking for information on anything which was previously posted here.

A Great Expansion Pack

By Hardflip

If you asked me who made Call of Duty: United Offensive, I’d probably say it was Infinity Ward. Is there any truth behind this? No. Gray Matter, also known as the people who made the god-awful Return to Castle Wolfenstein single player developed it. Perhaps it was just the idea of zombies, ghosts and demons that sidetracked their ambition to make a ‘good game’. If so, it’s very evident in this highly-anticipated expansion pack to the Call of Duty; a PC Game of the Year award winner.

To begin with, if you loved the original Call of Duty, you’ll love this one. As far as I can tell, Gray Matter have found what people liked the most about the original, improved on it with some of the best campaigns they could choose from World War 2, and improved a hell of a lot on the negative aspects Call of Duty had. One of these could be considered the difficulty. I’m not a brilliant first person shooter player, I’ll give you that. However, Call of Duty was one of the easiest games I’ve ever played; even on ‘Veteran’ mode it seemed as if it was on a normal setting.

In United Offensive, you start off with an extremely hard and cinematic mission in Bastogne against an incoming wave of German infantry and tanks. I’d have to say this mission was harder than any in Call of Duty, and it really showed with the constant artillery bombardment and one-hundred bullets flying at you a second effect. Straight away you can also pick up the graphical improvements they’ve made to the game. The particle effects have been vastly improved with dirt, fire and smoke. These vastly up the cinema effect you get from playing this well above-average World War 2 game, being better than any Medal of Honor game or expansion out there.

I’m not certain if the artificial intelligence has changed since Call of Duty, but in the expansion your team mates seem to be far more effective in covering for you. They follow you around more effectively and do the thing you’re more likely to do. Can’t say I’m terribly impressed at the Kraut’s method of hiding behind a pillar and peeking their head out to get shot, but I guess you do need cannon fodder to make these games more fun.

The game itself has climaxes, always at the beginning and end of a campaign. I’d have to say the beginnings of both three campaigns are the most explosive, and the endings are very reminiscent of the Pegasus Bridge mission from Call of Duty. Essentially, they’ve made a brilliant World War 2 expansion which is worth getting for the single player alone. I haven’t touched the multi player yet, since I wasn’t that interested in Call of Duty’s in the first place. But if you want an insanely fun single player experience to act as a filler between Doom 3 and the on-coming (I hope) Half-Life 2, get Call of Duty: United Offensive.

Graphics: 8.5/10
Dated, obviously, but with the new particle effects and all that’s going on, it’s still beautiful to look at.

Sound: 9/10
Everything seems so authentic, and it has awesome EAX effects for those with a 5.1 setup. You’ll feel you’re at the battle.

Gameplay: 9/10
It remains strong in this expansion, with rarely any slowdowns. You’ll be kept on your feet at all times.

Overall: 9/10
You may want to replay the single player on a harder difficulty, but I can’t imagine myself going through it again. However, it has multiplayer, with a decent mod community, so there’ll always be something new for you.


  1. #1  JohnDoe
    21st September | Reply

    I’m generally not a fan of singleplay, but I have to admit it looks really nice. is the gameplay smooth, like battlefields gameplay was not?



  2. #2  Hardflip
    21st September | Reply

    Battlefield’s gameplay was smooth? :P

    I’d say the shooting people all the time was very consistent, and I haven’t played any missions that sucked. There are differences in difficulties depending where you are in the campaign, but it was all pretty balanced for me.



  3. #3  JohnDoe
    21st September | Reply

    JD wrote: “like battlefields gameplay was not”, anyway, I was talking more about the graphical smoothness, mainly FPS wise, because in that aspect battlefield just sucked and this seems only prettier.

    so how does it run?



  4. #4  Hardflip
    21st September | Reply

    FPS is great, at least on my Radeon 9700 pro it is, at 1280×1024, full details and EAX 3 on. I don’t have Anti-aliasing on though, but it doesn’t damage it that much. The first mission may be a bit framey because of it’s hugeness, but it thins out after that.



  5. #5  Holliday
    21st September | Reply

    I am not usually one for expansion packs. I have a hard enough time completing the original game before I wander elsewhere, but this I may pick up.



  6. #6  Holliday
    22nd September | Reply

    Well I did in fact get it and its pretty cool. I’ve only played the first 2 missions but both are quite explosive. Call of Duty was unique for making you feel more like a soldier and less like an unstoppable war god. United Offensive furthers this.

    Like Flip said you really feel like there is a whole lot going on and you are just a small part of it.



  7. #7  Lord.Nagash
    22nd September | Reply

    I only ever played Call of Duty for the multiplayer, and now that my local LAN gaming place is shut down ( :( ), I simply havent got enough people to play against.

    I might still pick it up though. Occasionally people from the ex-LAN come around to play sometimes..



  8. #8  BitterGeek
    22nd September | Reply

    United Offensive is grand. The missions are bolder, prettier, and arguably more cohesive than those in the original game, and all of the new weapons are a great fit. I’ve also yet to touch multiplayer, but I can tell you it’s worth the price for the single-player campaign alone. Totally glad I splurged and picked this one up.



  9. #9  Kelmon
    23rd September | Reply

    Release…the…Mac…version

    As I’ve already mentioned in the forums, I went over to Apple and a laptop rather than my P4 desktop. Games are a bit thin on the ground and particularly so for those that will run on a laptop with a graphics card that is a couple of years old. However, I have bought Call Of Duty (thank you, Aspyr) and it does rock pretty hard. While I’m reduced to 800×600, it does fly along pretty well and so I’d be well interested in more of the same (just working my way through the SAS missions on the Dams at the moment).

    My only concern is that I pretty much suck at shooters and so a double-hard bastard version isn’t much of a turn-on. Is it really that rock-hard or can a complete pleb at least make progress? Bear in mind that the Pegasus Bridge level when all the tanks turn up took me ages to complete…



  10. #10  Hardflip
    23rd September | Reply

    You can make progress, but it won’t be very easy like the first one.



Archived entry. Read only